1. Identification

ItemDetail
InstrumentPresidential Circular (2026/9)
Official Gazette18 August 2026 — issue 33344
Signed17 August 2026
SubjectTürkiye AI Action Plan (2026-2030)
CoordinationMinistry of Industry and Technology
MonitoringNational AI Council
PredecessorNational AI Strategy (2021-2025)

2. Normative character: the limits of bindingness

A circular is an administrative instrument addressed to public institutions. It therefore imposes no directly enforceable obligation on private parties — it is neither a statute nor a regulation. In practice, however, it will reach the private sector through three channels:

  • Public procurement: the minimum 2% share of public investment earmarked for AI, and the public-sector adoption target, will crystallise as technical and compliance criteria in tender specifications.
  • Secondary legislation: regulatory sandboxes and data-sharing commitments carry a clear potential to become binding rules at regulation and communiqué level.
  • Supervisory expectation: monitoring through the Council will establish a de facto compliance standard for suppliers working with the state.

3. The four axes

AxisFocus
DiscoverPublic awareness and AI literacy
BenefitAdoption across public and private sectors
ProduceDomestic technology, models and infrastructure
GovernGovernance, regulation, oversight and ethics

A total of 16 actions sit beneath these axes.

4. Quantified targets

TargetScale / horizon
Installed data-centre capacity1 GW (2030)
Infrastructure investment mobilisedat least USD 10 billion
Share of public investment for AIat least 2%
Advanced specialists10,000
Application professionals100,000
AI literacy training5,000,000 citizens (2 years), 81 provinces
Open public datasets2,000+ (National Data Library, 2030)
Regulatory sandboxes5+
Single-window approvalmax. 30 business days

5. Principles

The plan is built on human-centricity, reliability, ethical responsibility, digital sovereignty and sustainable development. While this set does not map one-to-one onto the risk-based architecture of the EU AI Act, it points in the same conceptual direction on human oversight and trustworthiness. For companies operating in Türkiye that also place products or outputs on the EU market, the common ground between the two frameworks — documentation, data governance and human-oversight records — can be maintained in a single compliance file.

Practical takeaway for companies

For now the action plan is not a source of obligations but a forecast of the compliance calendar. Reasonable first steps for organisations that work with the state or operate in regulated sectors: inventory the AI systems in use, record data sources and their legal bases, put human-oversight thresholds in writing, and prepare the technical documentation likely to be requested in tenders.