TRENKO
Guide · Korea PIPA

A fully automated decision affects a person. They can now refuse it.

Since 15 March 2024, Korea's Personal Information Protection Act gives data subjects a right to refuse fully automated decisions and to request an explanation. Below: a disclosure notice and an automated-decision register.

Download the template
§ 01 — What Article 37-2 gives

A decision made without a human in the loop now carries rights.

Where a controller makes a decision solely by automated processing (including profiling) that significantly affects a data subject's rights or obligations, the amended Act gives the data subject two things:

The controller must, in turn, disclose in advance the criteria and the procedure of the automated decision — typically in the privacy notice — so the right can be exercised. "Solely automated" is the trigger: meaningful human involvement in the decision takes it outside Article 37-2.

§ 02 — What the controller must do

Duties that follow from an automated decision.

ProvisionSubjectWhat it means in practice
PIPA Art. 37-2(1)Right to refuseIndividual may decline a solely-automated decision that significantly affects them
PIPA Art. 37-2(2)ExplanationThe individual may request an explanation of the decision
PIPA Art. 37-2(3)Controller's responseOn refusal or request, absent a justifiable reason, do not apply the decision, or take measures such as human re-processing and explanation
PIPA Art. 37-2(4)Advance disclosurePublish the criteria, the procedure and how personal data is processed, so they are easy to check
Consent / law / contractLimit on refusalWhere based on consent, a statutory provision or legal obligation, or necessary for a contract (Art. 15(1) items 1, 2 and 4), refusal may not apply — explanation still does
PIPA Art. 4Data-subject rightsThe above sit alongside access, correction and deletion
PIPA (privacy notice)TransparencyThe criteria/procedure typically live in the privacy policy

PIPC has issued guidance on the scope of "solely automated"; confirm the current text before relying on it.

§ 03 — Template

PIPA automated-decision disclosure & register — blank.

Copy the text below or download it as markdown. No sign-up.

KR-PIPA-01 · Version 1.0 Download .md ↓
# KOREA PIPA — AUTOMATED-DECISION DISCLOSURE & REGISTER

Document code: KR-PIPA-01 · Version 1.0 · Classification: Internal
Organisation: [NAME]   Prepared by: [NAME/ROLE]   Date: ……/……/20……
Reference: PIPA Art. 37-2 (automated decisions; in force 15 March 2024)

PART A — REGISTER OF AUTOMATED DECISIONS  (one row per decision)
Decision: [NAME]  ·  Purpose: [……]
Solely automated? [ ] Y [ ] N   ·   Significant effect on rights/obligations? [ ] Y [ ] N
Legal basis: [ ] consent [ ] law / legal obligation [ ] contract [ ] other: ……
Criteria (main factors): [……]
Procedure (how the decision is produced): [……]
Human-review contact / channel: [……]

PART B — ADVANCE DISCLOSURE NOTICE  (for the privacy policy)
"We make the following decisions using solely automated processing:
[LIST]. The main criteria are [……] and the procedure is [……].
You may (i) refuse to be subject to a solely automated decision, except
where it is based on your consent, on a statutory provision or legal
obligation, or is necessary for a contract; and (ii) request an
explanation of the decision and review by a person.
To exercise these rights, contact: [CHANNEL]."

PART C — REQUEST-HANDLING WORKFLOW
[ ] Intake channel for refusal / explanation / review requests
[ ] Identity verification
[ ] Human reviewer assigned (independent of the automated step)
[ ] Response within [PERIOD]; outcome and reasoning recorded
[ ] Log kept: request, decision reviewed, reviewer, outcome, date

PART D — RECORDS
Retain the register, disclosure versions, and request/response logs.

Owner: [ROLE]   Review cycle: [PERIOD]   Next review: ……/……/20……

This template is general and does not constitute legal advice.
§ 04 — Filling it in

Three things the template does not settle for you.

  1. "Solely automated." Whether a human is meaningfully in the loop is a factual assessment; a rubber-stamp does not remove the decision from Article 37-2.
  2. Significance. Whether the effect on rights or obligations is "significant" is judged case by case.
  3. Criteria disclosure. How much of the logic to publish without exposing trade secrets is a drafting judgement.
Note This template is a general framework. Whether a decision is 'solely automated', whether its effect is 'significant', and how much of the criteria to publish depend on the facts of your processing.
§ 05 — Frequently asked

Questions.

When did the automated-decision rights take effect in Korea?

The relevant PIPA provisions (Art. 37-2) apply from 15 March 2024. The Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) has issued implementing guidance.

What does 'solely automated' mean?

A decision made by automated processing without meaningful human involvement. If a person genuinely reviews and can change the outcome, it usually falls outside the refusal right — though explanation duties may still apply.

Can we rely on consent to keep using automated decisions?

Where the decision is based on the data subject's consent, on a statutory provision or legal obligation, or is necessary for a contract, the right to refuse may not apply. The rights to an explanation and to disclosure of the criteria still operate.

What has to be published in advance?

The criteria and the procedure of the automated decision, typically in the privacy notice, in enough detail for the data subject to understand and exercise their rights.

Related

Read next.